Legal Opinion

People v. Jose C.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen G. Crane, J.

The People moved pursuant to CPL 190.75 (3) for authorization to resubmit to another Grand Jury the charges that the Fourth February-March Grand Jury had dismissed against defendants Jose C. and Elvis R1 The standards the court must apply in deciding whether to grant this motion were summarized in People v Dykes (86 AD2d 191, 195):

“[A] determination by the Grand Jury that the evidence before it does not warrant an indictment should end the matter and there should not be a resubmission unless it appears, for example, that new evidence has been discovered…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. ScarboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. PadgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-JassoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. WesleyNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. GegaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ephamka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
  5. United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-JassoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API