Legal Opinion
Kirchmeyer v. S. Subramanian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: We find that, under the circumstances of this case, the affidavit of decedent’s physician, proffered in support of the motion, constituted the presentation of additional facts which sufficed to make plaintiff’s motion a motion to renew (see, Roberts v Narcissus Boutique, 72 AD2d 808). Therefore, this appeal is properly before us since an appeal lies from the denial of a motion to renew (see, Seabrook Realty Corp. v 139 W. Mut. Assocs., 60 AD2d 821).
Supreme Court’s denial of plaintiff’s renewal motion for leave to amend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buono v. Victory Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Seabrook Realty Corp. v. 139 W. Mutual Associates, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Ullrich v. Rocking Horse Ranch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Roberts v. Narcissus Boutique, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rubick v. AtkinsNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Birnbaum v. GiangualanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Birnbaum v. GiangualanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- CHIAPPONE, GINA M. v. WILLIAM PENN LIFE INS. CO. OF N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Chiappone v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.