Legal Opinion

Rubick v. Atkins

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan B. Carey, J.

Introduction

Motion by the named plaintiffs attorney for leave to amend the caption of this action to reflect substitution of two decedent *797parties, and for leave to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action for wrongful death.

Facts and Procedural Posture

According to the allegations housed in the named plaintiffs proposed amended complaint, the named plaintiff, Carol Rubick, received oncological treatment at defendants Robert C. Atkins, M.D., P.C. (hereinafter the P.C.) and the Atkins Center for Complementary Medicine from September 1995 to October…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGuire v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Kordonsky v. AndrstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Ludwig v. Horton Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Liebman v. NewhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Kirchmeyer v. S. SubramanianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rubick v. AtkinsNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API