State v. Toth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Henry M. Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and the sentence thereupon imposed. There was no motion for a new trial. Defendant’s present counsel did not represent him at the trial. It is here contended (1) that the evidence does not sustain the conviction, and (2) that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence over defendant’s objection.
The facts, except those directly pertaining to the alleged assault, are not seriously in dispute. Emil Kish and his wife lived on a farm near Elk River in Sherburne…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Simmons v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. TrockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. LightheartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BallesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- State v. WeigoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. ZaccardiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964