Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward and Company v. Roy Stone Transfer Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1964No. 9217_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether in this case the Interstate Commerce Commission, rather than the District Court, has primary jurisdiction to determine the meaning of a disputed tariff.

Over a period of time the Roy Stone Transfer Corporation carried furniture shipped from points in Virginia to Montgomery Ward stores in the South. For these shipments, the Transfer company charged the rate prescribed in a tariff designated as 13280. Montgomery Ward contends that the charge should properly have been made under a lower tariff designated as 13220. It claims a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul M. Garrett, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Metropolitan Shippers' Clearings Corp. Of Washington v. time-d.c., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. F.P. Corp. v. Golden West Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Erman-Howell Division of Luria Steel & Trading Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API