Legal Opinion

People v. Sheperd

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1976No. 75-230PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULAND, Judge.

Defendant, Michael Sheperd, appeals from his conviction by a jury of rape and deviate sexual intercourse by force. We remand the case for additional proceedings.

Insofar as pertinent here, the People’s case was based principally upon the testimony of the complaining witness to the effect that defendant compelled .her to submit through force and threats with a knife. Defendant testified that the witness consented in all respects and that no force or threats were involved. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial and in limiting cross-examination…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. SimboloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. People v. KeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Johnson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WyrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. State v. QuinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API