Legal Opinion

Reznik v. McGowin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1933No. 6 Div. 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The sole question presented on appeal is the proper venue of a hill in equity for the specific performance of an executory contract to convey • real estate, which includes an exchange of lands located in different counties.

Complainant, so the hill avers, entered into an executory contract in writing with respondent by which complainant sold real estate in Birmingham, Jefferson county, to respondent, a resident of Butler county, at an agreed price, payable in part cash, part by assuming an outstanding mortgage on the lands, part by the assignment of certain securities held by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 48th Street Fairfield Inv. v. Fairfield-Am. Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Fairchild v. Union Ferry Co. of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Smith v. VeghtenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shomo Land Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API