Legal Opinion
William S. Kachele, Jr. v. Joe El-Maasri, et al.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 28, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03458Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 WILLIAM S. KACHELE, Jr., Case No.: 25-cv-3458-AGS-MMP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 JOE EL-MAASRI, et al., [ECF No. 15] 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 On January 23, 2026, pro se Plaintiff William S. Kachele, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed an 21 ex parte motion seeking a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 26(c) to prohibit “Defendant” from contacting Plaintiff’s non-party employees regarding 23 the instant matter. ECF No. 15 at 1–2. For the reasons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Open Software Foundation, Inc., and Hewlett Packard Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.