Legal Opinion

Schimmel v. Detroit Pressed Steel Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Carl Schimmel presented his claim for compensation against the Detroit Pressed Steel Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order denying a petition to discontinue payments for total disability, defendant and the American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

On October 31, 1917, the claimant, who was .employed by the appellant Detroit Pressed Steel Company, in the capacity of electrician, sustained an accidental, crushing injury to his left hand, when said hand was run over by an electric traveling crane. The nature of the claimant’s work was such as required him to work in elevated places, requiring him to maintain his balance by whatever means were near at hand, while he carried on his work. He was engaged in placing conduits between certain buildings of said appellant, and was required for the time being to work near a crane runway. While…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lovalo v. Michigan Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jameson v. Walter S. Newhall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Limron v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. King v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nieminen v. Isle Royale Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Webber v. Dort Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API