Legal Opinion

Ah Lep v. Gong Choy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendants-appeal. Even admitting that the money in controversy was loaned and was used in the partnership, the partnership is not bound, since the credit was given to the individual member; and the charge of the court in relation thereto was erroneous. (Livingston v. Roosevelt, 4 Johns. 271, 272; S. C., 4 Am. Dec. 273; Jaques v. Marquand, 6 Cow. 502,503; Whitaker v. Brown, 16 Wend. 505; Foot v. Sabin, 19 Johns. 158; S. C., 10 Am.

Read the full summary

Multnomah County. Defendants-appeal. Even admitting that the money in controversy was loaned and was used in the partnership, the partnership is not bound, since the credit was given to the individual member; and the charge of the court in relation thereto was erroneous. (Livingston v. Roosevelt, 4 Johns. 271, 272; S. C., 4 Am. Dec. 273; Jaques v. Marquand, 6 Cow. 502,503; Whitaker v. Brown, 16 Wend. 505; Foot v. Sabin, 19 Johns. 158; S. C., 10 Am. Dec. 208; Farmers’ Bank v. Bayless, 35 Mo. 437, 438.) The right of a partner to bind the firm is limited to the partnership business, and the •…

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

This action was for money alleged to have-been loaned by the respondent to the appellants. Am attachment was sued out and levied upon their property.. They filed , an answer, to the complaint, in which they denied that the respondent had loaned any money to-them, and by giving an undertaking, procured, prior .to> the trial, a release of the attachment. The case was tried at the January term, 1885, of the Circuit Court, by jury duly impaneled, who returned a verdict in favor of the respondent and against the appellants for the sum of' $508, the amount of money claimed to have been loaned, with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  2. Holcomb v. TealOregon Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  3. Che Gong v. StearnsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tillamook Dairy Ass'n v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gaffney v. HoytIdaho Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API