Legal Opinion
Kortenhaus v. Eli Lilly & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 4, 1988PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
228 N.J. Super. 162 (1988)
549 A.2d 437
SUSAN KORTENHAUS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ELI LILLY & COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ABC, INC. NOS. 1 THROUGH 400 (NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN BUT USED TO DESCRIBE MANUFACTURERS OF DES), DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 1988.
Decided October 4, 1988.
Before Judges GAULKIN, BILDER and R.S. COHEN.
John L. McGoldrick argued the cause for appellant (McCarter & English, attorneys; John F. Brenner and Lisa M. Goldman, on the brief).
James M. Docherty argued the cause for respondent (Cohn & Lifland, attorneys;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- C. A. Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Slowinski v. Valley Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Eason v. Linden Avionics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Barker v. BrinegarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Adelman v. BSI Fin. Servs., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- SOUTH BEND LATHE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellan-Cross AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.