State v. Young
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in the Order of the Court. I write specially only to elaborate on why the State cannot further prosecute this particular action.
Rowell v. Smith, 534 P.2d 689 (Okl.Cr.1975), cited as authority for this bar, comes from a long line of cases making it clear further prosecution is barred, not because of any Jeopardy considerations, but because of statutory ones. The sustaining of a Demurrer to the indictment or information constitutes a statutory bar to another prosecution for the same offense unless it appears of record that the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WaldrepCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- State v. WaltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- State v. TylerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- State v. MazurekCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Rowell v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975