Legal Opinion

Opdyke v. Stephens

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by the

Chief Justice.

Error to the Morris circuit. Stephens, the defendant in error, brought an action of replevin in the Morris circuit for a lot of timber, and recovered judgment. To reverse that judgment the defendant below has brought this writ of error. On the trial, to prove property in the timber, the plaintiff relied upon his title to the land where the timber was cut. The precise point in controversy involved the true location of the north lines of the plaintiff’s tract. If those lines are located according to the claim of the plaintiff, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Chinoweth v. Lessee of HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Rockwell v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. McIver Lessee v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Chidester v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
  3. Schroeder v. EngroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Schroeder v. EngroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API