Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Engroff
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 22, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 452 (1959)
155 A.2d 15
HAROLD W. SCHROEDER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT W. ENGROFF AND ADELAIDE L. ENGROFF, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND ROLAND HOSICK AND LILLIAN HOSICK, HIS WIFE, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1959.
Decided October 22, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.
Mr. Harold W. Schroeder argued the cause for appellant, pro se.
Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for respondents Engroff (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Holmes v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Dallas Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Post v. Wilkes-Barre Connecting R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hofer v. CarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bailey v. LookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. HLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960