Legal Opinion

Wingo v. DPR Construction

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. WCB 96-01814; CA A96019Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying him payment of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. He assigns error to the Board’s application of former OAR 436-60-030)(11)(b)1 to the facts of this case in arriving at its conclusion that he is not eligible for TTD. We review the Board’s decision for errors of law and substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(a) and (c), and affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Claimant was a member of a carpenter’s union and was dispatched by the union to employer in September 1995. Claimant suffered a compensable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Roseburg Forest Products v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Amuchastegui v. Department of EmploymentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Roseburg Forest Products v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API