Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Terry v. Terry

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 2000No. A083746; No. A083772Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SEPULVEDA, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion reversing the trial court and ordering termination of spousal support. I concur in the remainder of the majority opinion.

The parties separated in 1993 after more than 34 years of marriage. In August 1995, the trial court entered a permanent order of spousal support in favor of Ms. Terry in the amount of $8,750 per month after finding that Mr. *934Terry had an annual income between $315,000 and $340,000, and that Ms. Terry had reasonable needs amounting to $120,000 to $144,000 per year, net…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API