Legal Opinion

Naugher v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1984No. 83-176PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only question in this case is whether Naugher was entitled to have the jury instructed that it could consider his intoxication in determining whether he acted with the specific intent required for the commission of the crime charged. An appropriate instruction with respect to the effect of intoxication upon specific intent was offered by Naugher at his trial, but the district court refused to give it. We conclude that the district court properly refused to give the offered instruction, and we affirm the judgment and sentence.

In his brief Naugher states the issue to be:

“Whet…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Demps v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Scheikofsky v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. TurvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Nicholson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Eatherton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Blair v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API