State v. Holt
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
The respondent was convicted of rape and sentenced to serve ninety-nine years in the State Penitentiary. Upon appeal the Criminal Court of Appeals reversed this judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. We granted certiorari.
This case presents the issue of the admissibility of testimony by an expert medical witness, a psychiatrist, when asked to express an opinion in regard to the sanity of a defendant in a criminal case based on subjective symptoms. The point raised here appears to be of first impression in this State.
The facts necessary to note are as follows:
*723This crime was committed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Martz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- Higgins v. SteideCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Dowling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Waltermeyer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Meade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Meade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972