Legal Opinion

State v. Holt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer

The respondent was convicted of rape and sentenced to serve ninety-nine years in the State Penitentiary. Upon appeal the Criminal Court of Appeals reversed this judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. We granted certiorari.

This case presents the issue of the admissibility of testimony by an expert medical witness, a psychiatrist, when asked to express an opinion in regard to the sanity of a defendant in a criminal case based on subjective symptoms. The point raised here appears to be of first impression in this State.

The facts necessary to note are as follows:

*723This crime was committed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  2. Martz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. Higgins v. SteideCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Dowling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waltermeyer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Meade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  3. Meade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API