Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1998No. S97A1968PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

Catara Hill appeals her conviction for the murder of Phalonda Howard, 1 claiming that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to her lawyer’s previous representation of a witness for the prosecution, and that the trial court erred by giving an improper sequential charge to the jury. Having reviewed the transcript of the proceedings, we conclude that no improper conflict of interest arose due to trial counsel’s earlier representation, in an unrelated matter, of a witness to the murder. We also conclude that the trial court’s charge to the jury did not include an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. United States v. Allan RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Moon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. James v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Norton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API