Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Tucker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint in two paragraphs, by appellant against the appellees, for partition of lands. The first paragraph avers that appellant is the owner in fee-simple of the undivided one-half of the lands described, deriving his chain of title, through various links, from Jacob Puterbaugh, who was the original patentee of the land. Also alleging a chain of title to the remaining half, through various links, from the same patentee, in Sarah A. Tucker, who is the wife of Alba M. Tucker and the daughter of John H. Henry.

The second paragraph is the same as the first, at least we can perceive no legal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martindale v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Winslow v. WinslowIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Doe on the demise of Harlan v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Stafford v. NuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Liles v. PittsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. King v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Peck v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. English v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Vance v. SchroyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API