Legal Opinion

Tori Kruger-willis v. Heather Hoffenburg

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 28, 2017No. 48375-1-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

¶1 This is the third time this case has been before us on appeal. This appeal addresses whether defense counsel for Heather Hofferbert 1 had authority to appear and act on her behalf regarding a vehicle damage claim filed against her by Tori Kruger-Willis. Kruger-Willis appeals the trial court’s decision denying her RCW 2.44.030 motion and ruling that defense counsel had the authority to represent Hofferbert, entering judgment against Kruger-Willis, and denying her motion to reconsider. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that the trial court did not err in holding that defense…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great American E & S Insurance Co., V. Sinars Slowikowski Tomasaka LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  2. Joel Zellmer v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Darian D. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API