Horne Motors, Inc. v. Latimer
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
Defendant in error, Russell O. Latimer, recovered judgment for $11,654.50 in a damage action, wherein Horne Motors, Inc., and D. C. Berry (plaintiffs in error) were defendants, and the latter parties have brought up the rather voluminous trial proceedings for review. To obviate an analysis of lengthy pleading, we will briefly outline certain material facts; issues being apparent from jury questions and answers, and the complaints of plaintiffs in error concretely stated in eighteen ' several propositions. Referring to the parties as they were originally styled, or by name, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Phoenix Refining Co. v. TipsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. DardenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BallewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Mexican National Railway Co. v. MussetteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mrs. Eva Wright and the Standard Insurance Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Le Sage v. PryorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Lesage v. PryorTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Meinen v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.