Legal Opinion

Groff v. Smith

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1940No. 45PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finding of Facts

PIINCKS, District Judge.

A. All the facts of this case are stated in an extensive stipulation which may be deemed a part hereof. I think, however, the following resume will suffice for an understanding of the rulings which I shall presently indicate:

B. 1. The plaintiff on November 11, 1936, gave 14,000 shares of Electrolux Corporation to his wife, and paid a gift tax thereon based on a valuation of $23,375 per share, which was the average mean selling price on the Montreal Exchange for November 10 and November 12 (November 11 being a holiday). Thereafter the plaintiff duly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lorenzo Alvary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Helvering v. MaytagCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Havemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1955
  5. Havemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API