State v. Ragona

Defendant was convicted of tbe charge of committing lascivious acts with a child of six. For obvious reasons, we do not undertake to make a detailed statement of facts other than such as may be necessary for a decision of the six assignments of error presented for our consideration.

I. The first assignment of error challenges the competency of prosecutrix to testify. Upon examination by the court, she testified as follows:

‘ ‘ The Court: Do you know the difference between the truth and a lie? A. Yes. Q. Do you know what it is to tell the truth? A. Yes. Q. Is there any difference between the…