Legal Opinion

State v. Diggins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1939No. 44791PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

I. Defendant’s first proposition is that the court erred in permitting the witness, Margaret Blanchard, 8 years of age, to testify because she did not understand the meaning of an oath, nor what it meant to be a witness. On preliminary examination as to her competency by the court, she testified she knew what “telling the truth” meant and knew what a lie was; that it was wrong to tell a lie, and that punishment was the penalty for not telling the truth. She further testified:

“Q. If I ask you to hold up your hand, I will say to you ‘will you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. State v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. State v. BeltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. State v. HetlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. State v. DorseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RankinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  3. State v. RagonaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. State v. LahmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. State v. LaVerne BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API