State v. Diggins
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.
I. Defendant’s first proposition is that the court erred in permitting the witness, Margaret Blanchard, 8 years of age, to testify because she did not understand the meaning of an oath, nor what it meant to be a witness. On preliminary examination as to her competency by the court, she testified she knew what “telling the truth” meant and knew what a lie was; that it was wrong to tell a lie, and that punishment was the penalty for not telling the truth. She further testified:
“Q. If I ask you to hold up your hand, I will say to you ‘will you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- State v. BeltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- State v. HetlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- State v. RagonaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State v. LahmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- State v. LaVerne BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.