Legal Opinion
United States v. Shockey
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2008No. 08-7013PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Defendant-Appellant Phillip Daren Shockey pled guilty to two counts — Conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and Possession of a Counterfeit Security with Intent to Deceive in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 513(a) & 2 — of a multi-count Indictment filed against him. As part of his plea agreement, Shockey waived his right to appeal. Nonetheless, Shockey now appeals his sentence, arguing that it is unlawful because it is ambiguous and internally contradictory. We cannot reach the merits of Shockey’s argument because our precedent compels the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PollyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Leyva-MatosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. KutzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. BucioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.