Legal Opinion
Mallory v. City of Riverside
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 4, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-220PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE
MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. (Doc. No. 23). Plaintiff filed a Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. No. 30) and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. No. 31). In addition, Defendants moved that this Court admonish Plaintiffs counsel for ethical violations arising out of alleged racial allegations. See Reply, Doc. No. 31. In response Plaintiff filed an Amended Motion to Strike the portion of Defendant’s Reply…
2Cases cited136 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conroy v. CaronDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- COPELAND v. POLICE OFFICER CORY SADLERDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- McDaniel v. Chambers-SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Reed v. Presque Isle CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023