Legal Opinion

State v. Yurkiewicz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1942No. 32,915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Convicted under the statute (Mason St. 1927, § 10219) of swindling, defendant appeals from the judgment. The motion for new trial was denied upon what we consider good grounds.

The case has been here before on the certification of certain questions arising on demurrer to the indictment. State v. Yurkiewicz, 208 Minn. 71, 292 N. W. 782. The allegations of the indictment are there summarized. In substance they were well established by the state’s evidence at the trial. The crime of which defendant stands convicted was the swindling of one Beaudry by means of a combination…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. State v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. State v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. State v. DePauwSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API