Legal Opinion

Otis & Co. v. Teal

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,496PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action for damages for fraud. The fraud complained of consisted of alleged false representations, in reliance on which plaintiff was induced to purchase stock in an oil corporation. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.

The complaint alleged, among other things, and the plaintiff testified, that one Raymond Sargeant, a member of the defendant partnership, represented to him that the Roger Oil Corporation owned a large acreage of oil lands in the state of Texas; that the production was 3,000 barrels per day; and that -the oil corporation owned a pipe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turk v. BotsfordOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saxton v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Otis & Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Barsch v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Hiner v. CassidySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API