Legal Opinion

Barsch v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1943No. 14,965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

This is an automobile accident case in which plaintiff in error seeks to reverse a judgment for $2,500 and costs entered in accordance with the verdict of a jury in favor of Louise B. Hammond, to whom we hereinafter refer as Mrs. Hammond, defendant in error, whose husband died as a result of injuries sustained in the accident. A default judgment for $5,000 had been entered prior to this one, but due to a deficiency in the service of process, counsel for Mrs. Hammond, confessed error; the default judgment was set aside and a trial had on the merits. Plaintiff in error, Barsch, was the owner of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. . StraderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Hertz Driv-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. Otis & Co. v. TealSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Tew v. PowarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Hiner v. CassidySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mince v. ButtersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. Hanlon v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. Lambotte v. PaytonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Eddy v. McAninchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API