Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSmith, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) insofar as it prohibits the City of Philadelphia (City) from assigning Police Officers Edward Greene, Lester Johnson and John O’Hanlon to the Police Department’s Differential Police Response (DPR) Unit and requires the City to issue weapons, badges and proper identification to the officers. I dissent because the record demonstrates that the City fully complied with the arbitrator’s award by reinstating the officers to their former positions and by restoring their back pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmeri v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Brandt v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Derry Tp. v. Com., Pa. Labor Rel. Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Scranton School District v. Scranton Federation of Teachers, Local 1147Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API