Legal Opinion
Amadi v. United States
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 22, 2003No. 5:02CV1383(HGM/GJD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the court is plaintiffs motion pursuant to Rule 41(g) 1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure seeking the return of property allegedly seized by agents of the United States Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) on November 3, 1994. See Dkt. No. 1, Compl. Specifically, plaintiff demands the return of one African white rock and one African carved wood. The government opposes plaintiffs motion on three grounds, and moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint arguing: (1) that it did not seize either the African white rock or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Keating v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Andre Lopez Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amadi v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Starkgraf v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025