Legal Opinion

Amadi v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided February 20, 2004No. 5:02-CV-1383(HGM/GJD)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER

MUNSON, Senior District Judge.

In a previous Memorandum — Decision and Order, the court denied the Government’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs pro se complaint for the return of seized property pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.1 The court also ordered the parties to submit any and all materials in support of their respective motions within twenty days. The court subsequently received additional submissions from the parties, and the Government again moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. In addition, on January 20, 2004, plaintiff,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hammed Adeleke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Luis Mora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API