Legal Opinion

Abernathy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1980No. 21178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This appeal is from a jury verdict in favor of respondent Susan Abernathy against the appellant The Prudential Insurance Company. We affirm.

In November 1976 respondent purchased a major medical expense insurance policy from appellant. In January 1977 respondent, on the advice of her physicians, began undergoing depilatory treatments for the removal of excess facial hair. Appellant refused to reimburse respondent for the cost of these treatments and respondent instituted this action. A jury verdict for $5,980 was rendered against appellant.

Appellant first asserts the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Zeh v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Haggerty's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  2. Shea v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Brooklyn Bridge, Inc. v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Sabatier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Shumake v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API