Shumake v. Travelers Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs sought reimbursement for Laetrile (amygdalin) and related nutritional therapy prescribed for James Shumake by his physician, Philip E. Binzel, M.D. Dr. Binzel determined that Shumake suffered from a metabolic disorder, a diagnosis he reached based primarily on the fact that Shumake had developed lung cancer. The Laetrile and nutritional supplements were prescribed as a treatment for the metabolic disorder. The trial court held that under the terms of the policy, plaintiffs were entitled to reimbursement in the amount of $17,478.20. Defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HoagMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Van Vactor v. Blue Cross AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Hastings Mutual Insurance v. Safety King, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- City of Port Huron v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lemieux v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.