Legal Opinion
State v. Rinehart
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2018No. 17CA3606PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Rinehart,
2018-Ohio-1261.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 17CA3606 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY PAUL E. RINEHART, : Defendant-Appellant. : RELEASED: 03/29/2018 APPEARANCES: Paul E. Rinehart, London, Ohio, pro se. Matthew S. Schmidt, Ross County Prosecuting Attorney, Pamela C. Wells, Ross County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Chillicothe, Ohio, for appellee. Harsha, J. {¶1} Paul E. Rinehart appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Rinehart contends…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. BarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. VanceOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. McDanielOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.