Legal Opinion
Fox v. HOLLAR CO., INC.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 1, 1991No. 89-1263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miriam Gail Lumpkin Fox, individually and as next friend of her minor son Kevin, filed a seven-count complaint against The Hollar Company, Inc.; George Lumpkin (Kevin's father); Joseph Stephen Eaglin; Ozark Motor Lines, Inc.; and Federated Mutual Insurance Company. The action resulted from a December 21, 1987, traffic accident in which Kevin was injured while riding in a tanker truck driven by Lumpkin. The truck was owned by Lumpkin's employer, Hollar, and was insured by Federated. The truck collided with a tractor-trailer truck that had "jackknifed" in the roadway. The jackknifed truck was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- ROE BY AND THROUGH ROE v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Robins Engineering, Inc. v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Superskate, Inc. v. Nolen by MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Ex Parte Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Walker v. CorkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Daniels v. Morris, Cary, Andrews, Talmadge & Driggers, LLC (In re Daniels)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.