Legal Opinion
Humane Society of the United States v. Glickman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 18, 2000No. 99-5309PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
The “International Convention for the Protection of Migratory Birds,” 39 Stat. 1702 (1916), between the United States and Great Britain (acting for Canada) sought to preserve, in the words of Justice Holmes, “a national interest of very nearly the first magnitude,” Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416, 435, 40 S.Ct. 382, 64 L.Ed. 641 (1920). The Treaty “recited that many species of birds in their annual migrations traversed certain parts of the United States and of Canada, that they were of great value as a source of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Robertson v. Seattle Audubon SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Bird Conservancy, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Protect Our Communities Foundation v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Hill v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.