Legal Opinion

Bronstein v. Pennsylvania R. R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1940No. 20368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit by the consignee of 21 ears of various perishable agricultural commodities against the delivering carrier for damages for injuries to the products incurred in transportation. There are involved six cars of tomatoes, five of peaches, five of grapes, three of cauliflower, and two of lettuce. The same general considerations apply to all of these groups, and they need not be dealt with separately in this discussion. In all the cars, the products were packed in containers, variously designated as lugs (tomatoes), baskets (grapes and peaches), and crates…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meltzer v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Jackson Co., Inc. v. P.R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buder v. FiskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  2. Tuschman v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Tuschman v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API