Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Burdo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1997Published

1DissentWesley, J.

Because I believe the majority expands the scope of People v Rogers (48 NY2d 167) and a defendant’s right to counsel arising from the commencement of a criminal proceeding, I respectfully dissent. In my view, defendant must establish an actual attorney-client relationship or an invocation of his right to counsel under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, § 6 of our State Constitution before the protection of Rogers becomes available. From my view of the record, defendant failed to establish either.

I

Under our constitutional jurisprudence, the right to counsel…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API