People v. Burdo
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentWesley, J.
Because I believe the majority expands the scope of People v Rogers (48 NY2d 167) and a defendant’s right to counsel arising from the commencement of a criminal proceeding, I respectfully dissent. In my view, defendant must establish an actual attorney-client relationship or an invocation of his right to counsel under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, § 6 of our State Constitution before the protection of Rogers becomes available. From my view of the record, defendant failed to establish either.
I
Under our constitutional jurisprudence, the right to counsel…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.