Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Haas, Howell & Dodd Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 14, 1934No. 10054PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHutcheson, J.
B. J. Gardner filed bis petition against Haas, Hpwell & Dodd and C. H. Broward, for injunction and interpleader, alleging that each of the defendants is a real-estate agent; that the plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate which was sold during the year 1933; that the commission for the sale of the property, amounting to $287.50, is claimed by each of the defendants; that the commission is due to one of the defendants, but the plaintiff is unable to say to which it is due; that he is ready and willing to pay the commission to the party entitled to it; that he is a mere stakeholder;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standley v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Newsum v. Interstate Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Bassett v. . LeslieNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. KidderIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- National Life Insurance v. PingreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lilley v. NixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- BRIDGES Et Al. v. COLLINS-HOOTEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- BRIDGES Et Al. v. COLLINS-HOOTEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016