Legal Opinion
Foote v. Waltham Netoco Theatres, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 28, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The plaintiff in the first action, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her in the defendant’s theatre. The plaintiff’s husband seeks to recover consequential damages in the second action. The cases were tried before a judge of a District Court who found for each plaintiff. The Appellate Division was of opinion that there was error in the denial of certain requests for rulings, and ordered the finding vacated and judgment entered for the defendant in each case. The plaintiffs appealed. We take the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robitaille v. Netoco Community Theatre of North Attleboro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Dillon v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Pastrick v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Toland v. Paine Furniture Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Tovey v. G. E. Lothrop Theatres Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Battista v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Wetmore v. McLellan Stores Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Allen v. Albert Zallen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Smith v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Fitzgerald V. Cain's Lobster House, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.