Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cunningham v. Citizens Insurance Co. of America

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1984No. Docket 70392, 70573Published

1DissentV. J. Brennan, J.

I respectfully dissent. Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America seeks reversal of the trial court’s grant of a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff under GCR 1963, 117.2(3). Summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(3) should only be granted where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. The court must be satisfied that it is impossible for the claim or defense to be supported at trial because of some deficiency which cannot be overcome. Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363, 372; 207 NW2d 316 (1973). It is my opinion that it was proper for the trial court to entertain a motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. AyvazianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Sentry Indemnity Co. v. SharifSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API