Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Niswonger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

We believe the law to be well settled in this state that a mortgagor who signs a mort gage containing a covenant to pay the debt secured by tbe mortgage is personally liable for tbat debt: 41 C. J. 393, 394, §§ 221, 223; The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428, 439, 440 (179 Pac. 261, 21 A. L. R. 403); Manley v. Smith, 88 Or. 176, 191 (171 Pac. 897); Marshall v. Middleton, 100 Or. 258 (91 Pac. 886, 196 Pac. 830, 19 A. L. R. 1421). Defendants rely upon tbe cases of Wright v. Wimberly, 94 Or. 1 (184 Pac. 740), and Myer v. Beal, 5 Or. 130. Tbe Wright v. Wimberly case was an action to recover judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Myer v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Marshall v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Manley v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mateyka v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Swanson v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Elliott v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API