Jeromy Gaddy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1DissentLee Ann Dauphinot, Justice
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I believe that it is constitutionally infirm.
After we issued our opinion in this case,1 attached as an appendix, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held in Bowen v. State that it may be unjust to acquit if an issue first raised on appeal affects the sufficiency of the evidence of the aggravating element.2 The Bowen majority reasoned,
In Collier [v. State, 999 S.W.2d 779 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) ], a plurality of this Court held that an appellate court does not have the authority to reform a judgment to reflect a conviction of a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.