Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ranum

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1932No. File No. 6010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action to quiet title'to Lots one, two, three,' four and six, in Block- thirty, and Lot fourteen, in Block fifteen, Ori’g.-' inal Townsite of Van Hook, Mountrail County, North Dakota. The complaint is in the regular statutory form claiming title in the plaintiff and-praying that .the defendants be'required to set forth their claims,! etc. The defendant, Banum, answered, ¡claiming to be the owner ’of) Lots one, two, three,-four ánd six in Block Thirty, Village of Van Hook, ' and that prior to tbé sale of Lot fourteen, in Block fifteen to the defendant, T. B. Kossum, he was the owner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mills v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bartell v. MorkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Schmidt v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API