Legal Opinion

Bartell v. Morken

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1954No. 7412PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Bertha L. Bartell, brings this action in statutory form, Section 32-1704, NDRC 1943, to determine adverse claims to and recover the value of the use and occupation of Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 of Section 6, Township 158, Range 91 in Mountrail County.

The defendant, Selmer Morken, by separate amended answer, denies the allegations of the complaint and with more particularity than we need set forth here alleges that Mountrail County obtained a tax deed to the premises involved on May 21, 1938, which was recorded in the office of the register of deeds of that county…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Campbell v. McCahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kalb v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Atwood v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Krumenacker v. AndisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bickel v. JacksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Muhammed v. WelchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Ashbrook's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jensen v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hieb v. JelinekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API