Legal Opinion

Ex parte State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1964No. 4 Div. 187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a petition for mandamus to require the trial judge to set aside a final' judgment which was rendered for plaintiff, after the court had granted, ex mero motu, a new trial to plaintiff in an action at law for damages. . . ¡

Petitioner was not a party to the original action at law but is a party respondent in' a *264suit in equity wherein plaintiff in the original action seeks to compel petitioner to pay the judgment which plaintiff had thus obtained against one of the defendants in the action at law. The suit in equity appears to be based on § 12, Title 28, Code 1940, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. McDonald v. LyleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Claunch v. EntrekinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Ex Parte CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Cleveland v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. SennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API