Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. James

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 2014Published

1Dissent

*819DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COVEY.

I concur with the Majority that the trial court’s order is an appealable order, and that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. However, I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s holding that the trial court erred in denying Land Tycoon, Inc.’s (Land Tycoon) petition to intervene in the mortgage foreclosure action instituted by Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-NC4 Asset-Backed Pass Through Certificates (Wells Fargo), 15 months before Land Tycoon purchased the property in dispute (Property) at an upset tax…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Banking v. NCAS of Delaware, LLC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Larock v. Sugarloaf Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Chidsey v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API