United States v. Shelly Grant Gambler, AKA Grant Gambler
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentMikva, Circuit Judge
A trial court cannot permit the government to shield its complaining witness from the probing cross-examination that our system of justice accords a criminal defendant. The right to cross-examine is particularly imperative when an articulate and determined witness, whose testimony is the only real evidence that a crime has in fact occurred, has shown a potential bias by filing a lawsuit against the defendant. I believe that the trial judge’s error in curtailing inquiry into Pottinger’s effort to bring a $100,000 damage suit against Gambler deprived the jury of evidence that could have…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.