Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Shelly Grant Gambler, AKA Grant Gambler

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 13, 1981No. 80-1825Published

1DissentMikva, Circuit Judge

A trial court cannot permit the government to shield its complaining witness from the probing cross-examination that our system of justice accords a criminal defendant. The right to cross-examine is particularly imperative when an articulate and determined witness, whose testimony is the only real evidence that a crime has in fact occurred, has shown a potential bias by filing a lawsuit against the defendant. I believe that the trial judge’s error in curtailing inquiry into Pottinger’s effort to bring a $100,000 damage suit against Gambler deprived the jury of evidence that could have…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API